I have taken to sitting sometimes in Josameto and watching the same person in a Vexor over and over gank haulers, then the neutral alt warps to the wreck, scoops it and warps off.

Then once he's done for the week, billions of ISK in loot up, he goes to Jan and repairs his sec ready for the next week with tags to no cost to himself...

Don't get me wrong, ganking is part of this game, but since these tags were introduced there's been far more smaller entities doing it.

No way to tell, that data isn't tracked publicly

Yup they never changed the tank of mining ships BIG TIME nor did they recently change the ability to strengthen your tank for freighters.

There is some pretty basic math that will keep folks from being ganked for profit... Nothing can protect you from wacked out role players (CODE) that do it for.... well I'm not really sure what goes through their noggins.

I'm saying that if people want to complain about the "good guys" not getting a piece of the action, then they need to campaign to have the NPCs stop doing their work for them.

Dude. Most gankers hide in station all day.

Well you are a member of CODE and therefore a roleplayer.

Players are 100% safe in stations.

I tried selling my ore to the empires but they didn't want it as it was too expensive due to the people ganking pushing up the costs.

I suggested making the empire navies intercept the gankers/criminals quicker which would allow us to mine ore cheaper for them. Still waiting on that but its a win win situation for everyone.

I guess you didn't read the post to which it was replying to even though I quoted it?

As for Wah! Wah! I suggest you look up James 315 campaign for CSM .

I agree with OP....there need to be much harsher punishments for career -10 sec status suicide gankers

stop the runaway deflation.

This just shows how far out in space Veers is.

If risk/reward is our metric then blue donut nullsec should be a heck of a lot less profitable than highsec.

You forgot to comment on his expert PvPing with his whole 2 solo kills.

Yes, except that in the blue donut there is no one for miles around actually trying to kill you! So yes the mechanics provide for unlimited risk, but how risky is the result if there are 0 hostiles utilizing them? Keep trying, buddy.

Get the carebear!

outlandish speculation

2. Increase GCC time from 15 to 20 minutes. This cutting back on ganks per hour.

there is also a pvp only area right? Null and low.

I said a pvp only area, people dont go to low and null to go shopping! I know that you can pvp everywhere, gz, you guys way too over the top.

Then... what exactly are you trying to say?

My opinion, is play the game how you likw. Do not tell others how it should be played. Not all that hard really.

Personally I think that there should be enough negative consequences for ganking that it is safe to autopilot a 200k+ ehp empty freighter in highsec. Might it get killed once in a blue moon for lolz? Sure. Should it be a virtual death sentence when going through Uedama? No way.

I expect the police to take real action against repeat offenders, and to attempt to protect the residents of highsec.

How you play a game says nothing about your moral values. Ganking someone in EVE is no different to bankrupting them in monopoly or checkmating them in chess. In fact, it is not as bad as those two things as it does not put them out of the game it simply returns them to the station where they can pick up and carry on

When you play other games do you always let your opponent win?

Bounties will surely help.
Like this, not only he is under the prosecution of white knight bounty hunters, he will have to deal also with his villainous and untrustable brothers.

Help The Law and The Law will help you.

Amen.